In a sign of global tensions over Taiwan and Ukraine at a meeting of the East Asia Summit in Cambodia, Wong walked out of an address by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. The Russian and Chinese foreign ministers walked out of remarks by their Japanese counterpart.
The Australian government has not endorsed or criticised Pelosi’s controversial visit to Taipei on Wednesday – during which she infuriated Beijing by confirming the US’s “iron clad” commitment to Taiwan’s democracy – but Marles’ latest comments reject the central claim in the Chinese show of force.
Marles drew a parallel between the Taiwan Strait and the Torres Strait, where the People’s Liberation Army sent a guided-missile destroyer and an amphibious assault ship in February.
While Australia complained that one of the Chinese ships used a laser against an RAAF surveillance plane, potentially blinding the crew, it accepted the vessels’ right to pass through the Torres Strait.
“We have seen a Chinese military vessel traverse the Torres Strait this year in accordance with international law and we make no complaint about that,” Marles said.
“But the rules of the road apply everywhere and they apply in the Taiwan Strait as well.”
The Chinese air force also risked a collision in international airspace in May by sending a J-16 fighter jet to intercept an RAAF P-8 Poseidon surveillance aircraft. The J-16 flew in front of the Australian plane and released “chaff” including aluminium shards that could have damaged the Poseidon’s engines.
Asked if Australia would change the pattern of its surveillance flights in response to that interception, Marles said the operations would continue because they reinforced the freedom of navigation in international airspace.
“With that flight, we were acting in accordance with international law in international airspace and we were asserting freedom of navigation, in this case freedom of overflight, in international waters and airspace,” he said.
“That’s not an esoteric concept for Australia. So much of our prosperity comes from trade with East Asia and obviously China itself as well as Korea and Japan, two of our top-five trading partners. So much of our prosperity, therefore, is based on the stability that has been provided by the global rules-based order in the world and specifically in East Asia.
“It matters that the rules of the road are asserted, and that’s what we were doing. And that’s what we’ll continue to do. I mean, that’s where our national interest lies.”
The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea was central to a ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague in 2016 that rejected Chinese claims of sovereignty over large parts of the South China Sea. But China has refused to recognise the ruling and has continued building military bases in international waters.
Speaking in 2016 as Labor’s spokesman on defence, Marles said he believed the Royal Australian Navy should conduct freedom of navigation exercises in those waters. He stood by that position in his interview this week.
“It was a principled statement that those options should be on the table as a matter of principle and my view hasn’t changed,” he said.
“Obviously, I am now aware of the detail of what we do and I can’t discuss that in a public sense.
“But what we can say is that the activities that the ADF undertakes are about asserting the global rules-based order, and in this instance, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and freedom of navigation, and the freedom of overflight, which goes from that.
“And it is fundamentally important to Australia. I have, in opposition and now in government, conveyed where our national interest lies to China. That’s part of how diplomacy works as well – it is respectfully but firmly explaining how we see our national interest and how we will continue to assert it.”
Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis from Jacqueline Maley. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter here.